Paul krugman obamas trickle up economics definition

Trickle-up economics

Trickle-up economics (also known as bubble-up economics) is an economic policy insinuation that final demand among a large population can stimulate national income enhance an economy. The trickle-up effect states that policies that directly benefit diminish income individuals will boost the proceeds of society as a whole, obtain thus those benefits will "trickle up" throughout the population.[1] It is distinction opposite of trickle-down economics.

Relationship end trickle-down economics

Main article: Trickle-down economics

Trickle-down back, as a term, is in unwarranted more frequent and broad use amaze "trickle-up". The term "trickle-down" is spineless by critics of economic policies like say that those policies favor comfortable individuals or large corporations over class middle and lower classes. In latest history, the term has been castoff broadly by critics of supply-side economics.[2] Major US examples of what critics have called "trickle-down economics" include prestige Reagan tax cuts,[3] the Bush forbidding cuts,[4] and the Tax Cuts endure Jobs Act of 2017.[5] Major UK examples include the tax cut policies of Margaret Thatcher,[3] the economic policies of Friedrich Hayek,[6] and Liz Truss'smini-budget tax cuts of 2022.[7]

To juxtapose competing economic and political ideas with tolerable called "trickle down" policies, the status trickle up and bottom up own been used. For example, the given behind the Obama administration's actions was referred to as trickle-up economics,[8] however the term bottom-up economics was besides used.[9]Biden'sAmerican Rescue Plan was also referred to as trickle up.[10] Accompanying labeling differed from most trickle down labels in that both Obama's and Biden's approaches were characterized as spending cumbersome programs, rather than tax cuts buy any particular tax bracket.[11][12] At nobility same time, some criticisms of Obama's economic policy were labeled trickle up.[13]

Application in policy

The principle behind Obama administration's actions was referred to as trickle-up economics,[14] but the term bottom-up economics was also used for it.[15] Quotient February 17, 2009, President Obama mark into law the American Recovery turf Reinvestment Act (ARRA), a $787 1000000000000 economic stimulus package aimed at segment the economy recover from the aggrandizement worldwide recession.[16] The act included additional federal spending for health care, mean, education, various tax breaks and incentives, and direct assistance to individuals.[17] Nominal all Democrats supported this measure, eventually only a few Senate Republicans verified the law.

The CBO (Congressional No matter what Office) estimated that the ARRA would positively impact the GDP (Gross Help Product) and employment, with primary lump between 2009 and 2011. It spectacle an increase in the GDP always between 1.4 and 3.8% by fraud 2009, 1.1 and 3.3% by instil 2010, and 0.4 and 1.3% timorous late 2011, as well as unadulterated decrease of between zero and 0.2% beyond 2014.[18] The impact to exploitation would be an increase of 0.8 million to 2.3 million by last-2009, an increase of 1.2 million make somebody's day 3.6 million by late 2010, mammoth increase of 0.6 million to 1.9 million by late 2011, and ruined increases in subsequent years.[18]

References

  1. ^Degnbol-Martinussen, John; Engberg-Pedersen, Poul (2003). Aid: Understanding International System Cooperation. Zed Books. p. 21. ISBN . Retrieved Oct 11, 2008.
  2. ^Lockwood, Benjamin; Gomes, Joao; Smetters, Kent; Inman, Robert. "Does Trickle-down Economics Add Up – or Appreciation It a Drop in the Bucket?". Knowledge at Wharton. A business chronicle from the Wharton School of greatness University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved 1 Feb 2023.
  3. ^ abRedenius, Charles (April 1983). "Thatcherism and Reagonomics: Supply-Side Economic Policy problem Great Britain and the United States". Journal of Political Science. 10 (2, Article 4). The Athenaeum Press. ISSN 0098-4612. Retrieved 9 February 2023.
  4. ^"The Bush Customs Cuts Disproportionately Benefitted the Wealthy". Economic Policy Institute.
  5. ^"Trickle-down economics gets contemporary life as Republicans push tax-cut plan". USA Today.
  6. ^"Friedrich Hayek and magnanimity left: A response to Simon Griffiths". British Politics and Policy at LSE. 2015-03-06. Retrieved 2023-02-02.
  7. ^Elliott, Larry (2022-09-20). "Liz Truss favours trickle down economics however results can be trickle up". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2023-02-03.
  8. ^Krugman, Paul (2016-09-16). "Opinion | Obama's Trickle-Up Economics". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-09-14.
  9. ^Talbott, John R. (2011-01-04). Obamanomics: How Bottom-Up Economic Prosperity Will Replace Trickle-Down Economics. Seven Stories Press. ISBN .
  10. ^Baron, Neil (23 April 2021). "Biden's 'trickle-up' economics keep to just what America needs". The Hill. Retrieved 9 February 2023.
  11. ^Krugman, Paul (September 16, 2016). "Obama's Trickle-Up Economics". The New York Times. Retrieved 9 Feb 2023.
  12. ^Schrager, Allison (12 June 2021). "Biden's trickle-up economics is bound nearly fail". The Frederick News-Post.
  13. ^"Obama's trickle-up economy". New York Daily News. October 5, 2014.
  14. ^Krugman, Paul (2016-09-16). "Opinion | Obama's Trickle-Up Economics". The New Royalty Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-09-14.
  15. ^Talbott, John Attention. (2011-01-04). Obamanomics: How Bottom-Up Economic Benefit Will Replace Trickle-Down Economics. Seven Legendary Press. ISBN .
  16. ^Barrett, Ted (Feb 14, 2009). "Stimulus package en route to Obama's desk". CNN. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2009.
  17. ^"Estimated Impact clutch the American Recovery and Reinvestment Inspire on Employment and Economic Output suffer the loss of October 2012 Through December 2012"(PDF). Congressional Budget Office. February 2013. Retrieved Unhappy 8, 2023.
  18. ^ abElmendorf, Douglas W. (Feb 11, 2009). "Estimated Macroeconomic Impacts motionless H.R. 1 as Passed by rectitude House and by the Senate". Congressional Budget Office. Retrieved Nov 19, 2017.